HUMAN MIGRATIONS *
(2001) has proposed a theory for the formation of many languages. As this is a very large topic, it
requires an organizational chart.. A simple way to arrange this still growing
number of languages and associated information is to break them up into six
groups: Early languages, Asiatic languages, West European, East European,
North American and Assorted.
HYPOTHESES RELATED TO THE THEORY
Hypothesis 1: The Saharan
language was the language of the peoples living in the Sahara during the last
Ice Age, who had created the first true civilization on earth, possibly
centered on lake Chad. As a result of deglaciation, starting about 16,000
bce., resulting in ever expanding desertification, these tribes were forced
to flee for their lives, creating an exodus culminating between 7,000 and
3,500 bce (see Climate). These
refugees created four main secondary civilizations in Mesopotamia, Egypt, the
Indus Valley and Anatolia.
Portions of the Saharan language are still
spoken as Dravidian
in India (170 million speakers), as Ainu on the island of Hokkaido (18,000 speakers in 2005) and
as Basque in Euskadi, Spain (800,000 speakers in 2005). Basque is likely the
closest resembling the original language of the exodus.
The people of the exodus from the Sahara brought with them a matrilineal
organized society, the nature based Goddess religion and the first highly
developed language, maintained by very strong oral traditions.
As a result of several major advances in a number of fields such as
agriculture, metallurgy, domestication of the horse and camel, astronomy etc.
the female-based religion was weakened and male domination arrived ca 3,000
bce. in Egypt, Mesopotamia and Anatolia, and about 1,500 bce. in India. The
newcomers brought along learned priesthoods who proceeded to invert all
aspects of the old religion, society, language, legends etc. A new language
was invented for each large area and placed under
the control of a king. Examples are, Sumerian and Akadian in Mesopotamia, Old Egyptian in Egypt, Sanskrit and Hindi in India,
Hebrew in Palestine,
Hittite and Luvian in Anatolia etc. All these were the product of formulaic
distortion and scholarly manipulation of the original Saharan language. The
Bible repeats the command to distort the original language in Genesis 11:7.
Hypothesis 5: These newly created languages
were then introduced to the local populations by taking young boys into
residential schools and forcing the new order onto them, where they were
often brutally treated. The purpose was to destroy the old religion and
language and the traditional oral teaching of wisdom, religion and legends,
replacing it with a patriarchal vision of the world and civilization. They
almost succeeded. The hidden sentences in the invented words can be decoded
) with the use of the Basque dictionary and a
simple formula (see Saharan).
(2001) proposed that all highly developed languages on earth (except possibly
Chinese) might have been developed from the original Saharan language, which in itself was also scholarly
enhanced from the Neolithic substratum. There exists no
"family" of Indo-European or Semitic languages. There are no
Indo-European or proto-Indo-European languages. Scholars invented all these unstable
languages. Only Saharan has remained relatively unchanged and is now spoken as Basque.
[Please also see Evolution of Human Languages]