[Note: All Basque words are in Italics and Bold-faced Green]
INDO-EUROPEAN
LANGUAGES *
[Contacts]
----Please CLICK on desired underlined categories
[to search for Subject
Matter, depress
Ctrl/F ]:
Next►
Introduction
An ancient language form that originated
in the sub-Saharan West African area of our most ancient civilizations has
been studied by Nyland (2001). He found that
many words used to describe names of places and things in the world seem to
be closely related to the ancient language, which Nyland called Saharan, and which later was
predated by the Igbo Language
of West Africa. Fortuitously, the Basque
Language is a close relative to the original Saharan. Following is a discussion of this
relationship:
History relates
that in early times a variety of people came to the British Isles from the
continent of Europe. These people had names such as Angles,
Saxons, Friesians, Vikings,
Celts, Normans, etc. They all brought
their own peculiar and primitive little languages along with them. These
languages then somehow magically blended into the beautiful, rich and
practical language we speak today. History also tells us that small groups of
people arriving in a new country usually accept the language of their new
environment, within two or three generations and surely this happened in
Britain. However, what happened to the highly developed language that was
spoken by the first inhabitants of Britain? That this language existed we
know from the writings of the early missionaries. They even used it in their Ogam inscriptions on stone
and in the Auraicept
na n'Eces, the
operations manual of the Benedictine clergy. In Scotland, the original
language was called Pictish, in Ireland Cruithin
and often it was referred to as the "Iron Language". How did it
disappear and what was it like? Surely there must be something left of this
first language of the British Isles.
Languages do not disappears without a trace, especially not in their
home country.
A THEORY IN QUESTION
Sir William
Jones was dispatched to India as a judge in 1783. Being an amateur linguist,
he spent his evenings teaching himself Sanskrit, a dead language that was
being maintained by priests who memorized its sacred hymns. In 1786 he told a
gathering of the Asiatick Society in Calcutta that many of the classical
languages, such as Sanskrit, Greek, Latin, Gothic, Celtic and Persian must
come from the same source: "a
stronger affinity ... than could possibly have been produced by accident; so
strong, indeed, that no philologer could examine them all without believing
them to have sprung from some common source, which, perhaps, no longer
exists". The
"perfect" relationship between the examples he gave was there for
everyone to see and Bingo!, the genetic family of Indo-European languages was
born, soon to be joined by a baffling assortment of laws of phonological
correspondence and an Ur-mother-language which had supposedly given birth to
the whole mess. The academic world built a big bandwagon and all jumped on,
linguists, archeologists, anthropologists, geographers, etc.. All are now
using the classification "Indo-European" as if it were a reality.
Over the past two centuries, thousands of highly paid linguists have
conducted their endless and fruitless research into the perceived genetic
relationship. All they need now is a few more years of study to answer all
the questions While studying
the language "family" some of the more astute linguists realized
there was something irregular. They decided that the truth could be
established by using classical comparative methodology. To accomplish this
they proposed four criteria supposed to be diagnostic:
"Indeed,
courses in historical linguistics at Universities all over the world, in
spite of much perplexing evidence to the contrary, mostly still persist in
adhering to strict Indo-European theories". In spite of
them, no one thought to ask if there could possibly be another explanation,
e.g. an invented relationship. To this day, this question is not being asked.
Edo Nyland maintains that there never were
any Indo-Europeans, there was no proto-Indo-European language and the family
of Indo-European languages is a long perpetuated inaccuracy. It an academic fraud
because the truth has long been known to a select group of religious
scholars, who have kept this knowledge secret, as was done in the past
millennia. If controversy is the lifeblood of scholarship, where are the real
linguistic scholars, where are the dissenters? Where is their courage? ENGLISH LANGUAGE
MANIPULATED
Other
manipulated languages are German, Latin, Greek, Russian, Sanskrit, Hebrew, Hungarian, Japanese etc. etc.
begin: dog: doctor:
It is clear from these and hundreds of other examples, that The English
language is an
Most academics
accept the Indo-European theory uncritically, teaching it to their students
as proven science and using the term in a variety of publications. However,
there are still some linguists who know the truth. Who these individuals are is still kept secret. In the 20th
century, many names have been attached to individuals in different parts of
the world that clearly indicate that the secret of the vowel-interlocking
formula and its associated language is still preserved and used. The most
prominent example is probably the name of the British royal family, Windsor. Windsor (the 'w' is meaningless)
The British
royal family adopted the name Windsor early in this century. It is fair to
say that they must have known exactly what they were doing. They could not have
picked a more appropriate name, but some linguist must have advised them. The
name Windsor is of course a much older name, which was probably made up by
some Benedictine linguists whose names have been long forgotten. Another high profile name invented in the 20th
Century is Stalin, Stalin:
This is a
fascinating name because the linguists told Stalin was that it came from the
Russian word "stal" (steel), man of steel. What was not conveyed
was that it also isa word play in the Basque language, the meaning of which
tells a very different, but more realistic, story. A much more
recent name is Habiari'mana, the Hutu president of Rwanda who, in 1994,
organized and initiated the mass-murder of the minority Tutsi people, long
living in his country. Habiari'mana:
It is not known
who made up this name, but it is a frightening thought that this mentality
still exists in our world. It is a good possibility that the scholar who made
up this name is still alive. He is not advertising his skills because this
specialized knowledge is jealously guarded by some secret society. UNILINGUAL EUROPE
As the glaciers
on the Alps and Caucasus melted, the air-circulation around the Mediterranean
changed drastically. The most affected area was the Central Sahara, which was
populated by a large population of independent tribes involved in grazing,
simple agriculture and some irrigation. Some tribes living along the west,
north and east shores of the Sahara, called the Sea-Peoples by the Egyptians,
had developed boat-building, star navigation and long distance ocean travel.
By 5,000 bce. the Central Sahara had become unlivable and most of the people
had to flee to the coast, where the Sea-Peoples were ready to ferry them to
Europe/Europa Europa
Africa
All these people
spoke the same Saharan language, adhered to the
same Goddess religion, practiced a democratic and matrilineal system of
tribal solidarity, and had the same strong oral traditions. There were no
weapons of destruction and no fortifications; there was little violence,
because all living things were precious and respected. There also was no
inter-marriage between the different groups and inter-tribal cooperation was
strictly formalized. These tribes were being ferried to the pleasant south
shores of Europe, the beautiful Danube river valley and the fertile lands
adjoining the Dnepr river. In general those who came from the Central Sahara
appear to have settled in Central Europe, the Near East and Russia, while the
Sea Peoples reserved all the islands and the
coastal areas for themselves, especially on the Atlantic islands and southern
Sweden. There were
modern people (Homo sapiens) in Europe before the Saharans arrived, as
the beautiful 30,000-year-old art in the massive caves of southern France and
northern Spain has shown. These people must have lived there through much of
the glacial period, occupying south facing caves and hunting the large
animals associated with a peri-glacial climate. They practiced the same Goddess
religion and may have spoken the same language. If this was the case, there must have been contact and likely
trade in animal skins for use in the skin-boats (ox hide) and for sails
(reindeer skin). Their fabulously painted caves may have been very famous and
pilgrimage sites for the believers. Wherever the newcomers lived together
with the original people, the two groups likely merged, as appears to have
been the case in the Basque country. However, in
general, the European
continent was very empty,
especially those lands vacated by the glaciers and ice fields of central
Europe, Caucasus and Scandinavia. One easily identifiable group of migrants
was the Berber Sea Peoples from Algiers and Morocco,
whose migrations and settlements can still be traced by their Rh-negative blood type. Even today, there are Berber
tribes in the Atlas mountains region, which have 40% of their members with
Rh-negative blood type. They sailed the Atlantic Ocean and became the Basques
(32%), the western Irish (25%), the Scots (25%) and the Old Norse on the
western islands of Norway (about 17%). They also left some of their unusual
blood type among the Lapps. At the time of their migration, they could not
yet travel through the North Sea, because that shallow sea was still dry
land, so they were forced to go west of Ireland. EXAMPLES OF
LINGUISTIC RELATIONSHIPS
If the languages
are not genetically related, the Indo-European group cannot be a family. The
Indo-European confusion started about 200 years ago when Sir William Jones
discovered the relationship between Sanskrit, Greek, Latin, and Germanic etc.
It looked so obvious, the "perfect" relationship between these words
was there for everyone to see and, bingo!, the genetic family of
Indo-European languages was born, complete with assorted laws of phonological
correspondence and an Ur-mother language which gave birth to all. Even though
controversy is the lifeblood of scholarship, all our academics happily
climbed on the bandwagon and the common people swallowed it, but where did
this wagon take them? Here are two words to which the VCV formula has been
applied. The first example is “father”: SANSKRIT
LATIN
GERMAN
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Another example is "field": SANSKRIT
GREEK
LATIN
DUTCH
As you can see,
the perceived relationship between these words is not genetic, such as
naturally derived from some imagined proto-language, but instead they are
contrived creations by highly skilled linguists using the universal Neolithic
language. The fact that most appear to be related is not due to a genetic
relationship, but because of skillful manipulation by the grammarians using
the VCV system of agglutination. . A very new system of organizing the
world's languages is urgently needed to accommodate the language invention
findings, as well as a different approach to the teaching of linguistics. A great deal of
time was spent analyzing many words and names in different
"Indo-European" and "Nostratic" languages to show that
meaningful words or sentences, written in the Basque language, are hidden in
many, if not all of them. It
certainly is revealing to see how the clergy handled the sensitive words
relating to sexuality, several of which are shown in the following wordlist.
Would they have been allowed to use such provocative language if it had been
suspected that their agglutinations would some day be decoded? It is necessary
to point out that Genesis
11:1 was right; everyone did speak the same highly developed
language wherever the Saharan immigrants had settled. It couldn't have been
any different because there was apparently no other highly developed language
anywhere else in Europe, the Near East, even India (see Dravidians) , Japan (Ainu) and Polynesia. They were settled by the migrants from the
Sahara. It appears true that around 2,000 bce. the decision was made in
Kizzuwadna, the religious center of Luvian male-domination, that the
language, the religion and the tribal structure of the people from the Sahara
was to be destroyed, to be replaced with invented
languages, a male god, nationalism and private land-ownership. When this
order was repeated in the Old Testament Bible it became a biblical command.
That was the mission of Benedictine
clergy when they built their monasteries in Britain. The people who
emigrated to Britain over the centuries, all spoke the same language, the Saharan language, which can
still be detected as a substratum, throughout Europe. With the use of
acrostic manipulation, using the vowel-interlocking formula, the original
Saharan language was mutilated to the point where recognizing it was almost
impossible. The one modern language, which apparently changed very little, is
Basque. The Basque dictionary written
by Gorka Aulestia (University of Nevada,
USA) is used primarily in the translations. Edo Nyland has been strongly
supported with advice by many Basque speakers in Euskadi and the United
States and urged to place this information on the internet. Most of
the linguists who have bothered to look at Nyland's
(2001 & 2002 ) research have suggested "more reasonable"
possibilities to explain the observed inconsistencies in our present
knowledge.. They then invariably decided to ignore the issue until a reason
for a more thorough examination arose. In such cases, the status quo has always
ruled and the needed examination has been stalled. The burden of proof is the
task of those shaking the status quo. It is up to the shaker to provide
evidence rather than for those simply suggesting that the evidence can be
accounted for by existing paradigms. In this respect, Nyland has been told
repeatedly by academics that nothing can be true outside of the status quo.
Therefore, nothing outside the status quo needs to be investigated, which is
a sure prescription for continued ignorance and high intellect superstition. |