|
File:
<rhipipho.htm> [For
educational purposes only] Glossary <Principal Natural Enemy Groups > <Citations> <Home> |
|
COLEOPTERA,
Rhipiphoridae (Reitter 1911) -- <Images> & <Juveniles> Description &
Statistics
Adult beetles are rather striking
with a markedly streamlined body, pectinate male antennae, but the color
pattern of many species is variable.
Females of Macrosiagon pusillum Gerst. may be completely red
or black, or the thorax may be of one color and the elytra and abdomen of the
other. Silvestri (1905) described the
genus Rhizostylops as having
certain characters and habits that seem to place it as an intermediate form
between Rhipiphoridae and Strepsiptera, and the adult females bear a striking
resemblance to those of the genera Mengenilla
and Eoxenos of Strepsiptera. Adult females of Rhizostylops as well as those of several species of Ripidius are apterous, degenerate and
larviform (Clausen 1940/62). All species seem to be
parasitic, passing at least a portion of the larval period internally in the
host body. This adaptation is
virtually unknown elsewhere in the Coleoptera. Development is accompanied by a hypermetamorphosis that is
comparable with that in Meloidae and certain parasitic Staphylinidae. Most Rhipiphoridae seem to attack
larvae of Hymenoptera in families Andrenidae, Scoliidae, Vespidae and
Tiphiidae. Those most often
encountered belong to the genera Metoecus,
Ripiphorus, and Macrosiagon. Rather extensive parasitization of scoliid and tiphiid larvae
in cocoons has been observed on several occasions. In India, Tiphia pullivora A. & J., 28.4% of field
collected cocoons yielded Macrosiagon
pusillum adults. Generally all representatives of the
family developing on Hymenoptera are harmful (Clausen 1940/62). This is a small, cosmopolitan
family with over 200 species known.
Characters include a serrated female antenna, male antenna pectinate
or flabellate, 11-segmented in both sexes; humpbacked, wedge-shaped beetles;
pronotum large, distinct, narrowed anteriorly; tarsal formula 5-5-4; elytra
entire; abdomen with 5 visible sternites, blunt at apex. The maxillary palps are 4-segmented;
labial palps 3-segmented; legs slender; trochantin absent. In some species females are apterous and
larviform. All known species are solitary
parasitoids during their immature stages.
Most attack larvae of Hymenoptera in the family Andrenidae, Vespidae,
Tiphiidae and Scoliidae. Some
parasitize adult and nymphal cockroaches.
Both primary and hyperparasitic species are known. First instar larvae are phoretic. Larvae under hypermetamorphosis. Cockroach parasitoids are internal, while
those species parasitizing Hymenoptera are internal only during the 1st
instar. Adults are free-living. Biology &
Behavior
Ripidius spp. departs from the normal behavior for the family,
both in host preferences and in relationships. Ripidius pectinicornis Thbg. was originally
described as early as 1808, as a parasitoid of Blatella germanica L.
under the name of Symbius blattarum Sund. by Sundervall in 1831
(Clausen 1940). Mature larvae were
found in the bodies of cockroaches on a ship, and adult females were observed
to lay their eggs abundantly. Stamm
(1935, 1936) extended studies on the behavior and larval forms of this
species. Schultze, cited by Clausen
(1940) recorded rearing R. scutellaris Hell. from Blattidae in
the Philippines, and R. boissyi Abeille is parasitic in nymphs
of Ectobia in Europe. The whole genus seems restricted to
Blattidae. It is also distinguished
in habit from those developing on larvae of Hymenoptera, by passing its entire
larval period within the host. R. pectinicornis
is gregarious, with 1-5 developing in each host, while those on Hymenoptera
are consistently solitary. Extensive observations have been
made on Metoecus paradoxus L., which is common in Europe
as a parasitoid of Vespa spp.
larvae. The parasitic relationship
was recognized early in 1864 by Westwood (cited by Clausen, 1940). Chapman (1870, 1891, 1897) first thought
this species was a commensal in the nest.
Murray (1870a,b) agreed with the conclusions of Westwood. Rouget (1873) obtained oviposition in the
laboratory and thought that under field conditions the eggs are laid on
blossoms, foliage, etc., and that the young larvae are then carried to the nest
by Vespa adults. Chapman later found the much distended 1st
instar larva, 10X their original length, within the bodies of the host
larvae, just beneath the integument of the 4th of 5th segment. Only a part of the 1st stage is passed
internally, and the 2nd instar larva is found as a collar encircling the
cervix of the host. Reproductive capacity of
Rhipiphoridae is relatively high, which is expected because of a high
mortality in the 1st larval stage.
Chobaut (1891) noted that the female of Macrosiagon flabellatum
F. lays ca. 500 eggs, and Silvestri recorded ca. 3,000 for R. inquirendus
Silv. Eggs are usually laid in
clusters, with the site of oviposition being variable. M.
flabellatum lays its eggs in
clusters in the soil, covering them lightly with earth. jarvis (1922) found that M. cucullatum
Macl. laid the eggs close together among the hairs on the undersides of the
leaves of Urenia and Ficus. Over 100 were found on a single leaf, covering an area of ca.
9-10 sq-cm. Metoecus paradoxus lays
the eggs in crevices in decaying wood.
Ripiphorus subdipterus Bosc. was found to
oviposit in the blossoms of Eryngium
(Chobaut 1906), and R. solidaginis Pierce does so in the
green buds of goldenrod, Solidago rigida (Pierce 1904). There are numerous adaptations correlated
with the location of the host stages and with the habits of the host adults
in case the latter serve as carriers of the triungulinids. In no case were eggs found to be placed on
or in close proximity to the host stages on which development of the larva
occurs (Clausen 1940/62). Of particular interest is the
manner by which the triungulinids gain access to the host, because it
involves transportation by some agency from the vicinity of hatching to the
host larvae in their cells. It is believed
that the triungulinids themselves do not take an active search for either the
host stages or the carrier but rather that they take up a position favorable
to contact with a carrier and then wait for it. Triungulinids of M. flabellatum attach themselves to Odynerus adults and are thus carried
to the nest (Chobaut 1906). Pierce
(1904) thought that the triungulinids of R.
solidaginis are carried by the Ripiphorus adults themselves, which
are thought to hibernate in the holes of Epinomia. This explanation is in view of the
occurrence of the triungulinids on opening buds of Solidago, a plant that is not frequented by Epinomia adults. However,
many of them were found on the bodies of bees of various genera living in the
Epinomia community. Triungulinids of R. subdipterus are
found on Eryngium blossoms and are
thought to attach themselves to Halictus
adults frequenting this plant (Clausen 1940/62). Macrosaigon cucullatum
is parasitic on larvae of Campsomeris
spp. in Australia. The wasps are
external parasitoids of scarab grubs in soil. Triungulinids of Macrosaigon
are found on the foliage of certain trees and the problem of reaching host
larvae in the soil, which are themselves parasitic and thus receive no
attention from the parent females, is more complex than that facing the
species mentioned previously.
Laboratory studies indicated that the triungulinids probably attach
themselves to the Campsomeris
females and are thus carried into the soil at the time the latter oviposit
and that at this time they transfer to the scarab grub and await the hatching
of the Campsomeris egg and its
subsequent development as a larva.
One triungulinid was found to remain motionless on an egg on a
paralyzed grub for 3 days, during which it made no effort to pierce the
chorion. Although development is
completed only on the mature larva in the cocoon, it is probable that the
triungulinid attaches itself to the partially grown larva or enters its body
prior to cocoon formation (Clausen 1940/62).
Triungulinids do not effect parasitization of scoliid or tiphiid
larvae after the cocoon has been spun. Among scoliid and tiphiid hosts of
various Rhipiphoridae, it is evident that if the triungulinids of the
parasitoid are carried into the soil by the females at the time of
oviposition, the extent of parasitization of the different species will vary
greatly in the same locality, due to diverse feeding habits of the adults. Scoliid females feed mainly at blossoms,
while the spring species of Tiphiidae feed almost exclusively on insect
honeydew and the summer and autumn species mostly on the secretions from
various nectar glands of plants. The
relatively high mortality of Tiphia
pullivora previously mentioned, is
possibly linked to a more general tendency to feed at blossoms than is shown
by other species in the field during the same season (Clausen 1940/62). A simple parasitic relationship in
this family seems to exist in respect to the Ripidius species which attack nymphs and adults of
cockroaches. In this genus the eggs
are thought to be laid indiscriminately in crevices, etc., and the
triungulinids attach themselves directly to passing hosts and enter the body
to develop, thus eliminating the requirement of a carrier. Triungulinids of all species are
equipped with a caudal sucker and 1-2 pairs of cerci of varying length which
they use to assume an erect position, with the legs entirely free, while
waiting to attach to passing insects, etc.
They are thought to have the jumping habit which is common to larvae
of this kind. The fee-living phase of larval
life may extend over a considerable length of time, during which food does
not seem to be required. However, Pierce
(1904) believed that the triungulinids of Ripiphorus
solidaginis fed on the plant
tissues or sap of Solidago soon
after hatching. He based this
conclusion on (1) that they are of considerably greater size than the egg,
and (2) that they are found only on Solidago,
which is not frequented by host bees.
It was assumed that this plant was utilized in preference to others,
in order to fulfill these food requirements.
A transitory plant feeding habit such as this is not in accord with
the habits of larvae of this type, and the evidence presented does not
definitely establish its occurrence.
The increase in size may possibly have been the result of imbibing
moisture from the leaf surface (Clausen 1940). With exception of Ripidius pectinicornis and Ripidius
spp. which pass the entire larval feeding period within the cockroach host,
all known species develop externally, having an internal phase only in the
1st stage. Sometimes this internal
period is short, but in M. flabellatum, entry into the Odynerus larva occurs during late
summer, and the parasitoid larva does not emerge for external feeding until
the following June. The developmental
cycle and larval habits are comparable to those of certain Perilampidae, in
particular species with hyperparasitic habits. Usually the host larva is not killed until it has completed
feeding and it prepared to pupate.
The cells containing parasitized Vespa
larvae and those of other host groups of similar habit as well are thus
closed in the normal way. In the case
of Scoliidae and Tiphiidae, the cocoons are spun before death (Clausen
1940/62). Transition from internal to
external feeding has been observed in Macrosiagon
flabellatum and Metoecus paradoxus (Grandi 1937).
In the former species, the greatly distended triungulinid, which is
several hundred times as large by volume as when newly hatched (see Clausen,
1940 for diagrams), emerges through a puncture in the 3rd thoracic segment of
the host, immediately casts it exuviae, which remains in the puncture, and
then assumes the feeding position in which it is found as a collar around the
1st or 2nd thoracic segment (see Clausen, 1940 for diagram). The triungulinid increases in length from
0.5 mm. at hatching to 2.5 mm. just prior to the first molt. The host larva is eventually consumed. Life Cycle
Most species of Rhipiphoridae seem
to have only one generation per year, which is closely correlated with the
cycle of the host. Ripiphorus solidaginis overwinters in the adult stage and lays eggs early in
springtime, with the adult stage attained again in August (Pierce 1904). However, Metoecus paradoxus lays
its eggs in late autumn, and the fully developed embryo persists in the egg
until springtime. Macrosaigon flabellatum lays its eggs in late summer, and overwinters as 1st
instar larvae within the body of Odynerus
larvae. M. pusillum is thought
to have the same hibernation habit, for adults emerge from Tiphia cocoons during July. Barber (1939) discussing observations of
J. C. Bridwell on Ripiphorus sp.,
parasitic on Augochlora pura Say, mentioned that the
triungulinids are found attached to the hairs of hibernating inseminated
female hosts. They overwinter in this
way, on the hibernating female bee, and transfer to her brood cells when
these are formed in spring. R. solidaginis
is believed to have 2 generations annually; Ripidius pectinicornis,
developing in cockroaches in the tropics, probably has a short cycle, with
several generations each year (Clausen 1940/62). In M. flabellatum and M. cucullatum,
the incubation period i 17 and 7.5 days, respectively. Larval feeding of Metoecus paradoxus
covers only 12-14 days. For detailed descriptions of immature stages of
Rhipiphoridae, please see Clausen (1940/62). References: Please refer to
<biology.ref.htm>, [Additional references may be found at: MELVYL
Library] Linsley,
E. G. & J. W. MacSwain.
1951. Bull. Calif. Ins. Surv.
1: 79-88. Linsley,
E. G., J. W. MacSwain & R. F. Smith.
1952. Univ. Calif. Publ. Ent.
9: 291-314. Selander,
R. B. 1957. Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 50:
88-103. |