& HUMAN MIGRATIONS
Erich Fred Legner
Nyland (2001) has proposed a theory for the
formation of many languages. As this is
a very large topic, it requires an organizational chart.. A simple way to
arrange this still growing number of languages and associated information is
to break them up into six groups: Early languages, Asiatic languages, West
European, East European, North American and Assorted.
----Please CLICK on desired
underlined categories to view:
HYPOTHESES RELATED TO THE THEORY
Hypothesis 1: The Saharan
language was the language of the peoples living in the Sahara during the last
Ice Age, who had created the first true civilization on earth, possibly
centered on lake Chad. As a result of deglaciation, starting about 16,000
bce., resulting in ever expanding desertification, these tribes were forced
to flee for their lives, creating an exodus culminating between 7,000 and
3,500 bce (see Climate). These
refugees created four main secondary civilizations in Mesopotamia, Egypt, the
Indus Valley and Anatolia.
Hypothesis 2: Portions of
the Saharan Language (an offshoot
of the Igbo Language) are still spoken
as Dravidian in India (170 million speakers), as Ainu on the island
of Hokkaido (about 18,000 speakers in 2017) and as Basque in Euskadi,
Spain (800,000 speakers in 2017). Basque is likely the closest resembling the
original language of the exodus.
Hypothesis 3: The people of
the exodus from the Sahara brought with them a matrilineal organized society,
the nature based Goddess religion and the first highly developed language,
maintained by very strong oral traditions.
Hypothesis 4: As a result
of several major advances in a number of fields such as agriculture,
metallurgy, domestication of the horse and camel, astronomy etc. the
female-based religion was weakened and male domination arrived ca 3,000 bce.
in Egypt, Mesopotamia and Anatolia, and about 1,500 bce. in India. The
newcomers brought along learned priesthoods who proceeded to invert all
aspects of the old religion, society, language, legends etc. A new language
was invented for each large area and placed under
the control of a king. Examples are, Sumerian and Akadian
in Mesopotamia, Old Egyptian in Egypt, Sanskrit and Hindi in
India, Hebrew in Palestine,
Hittite and Luvian in Anatolia etc. All these were the product of formulaic
distortion and scholarly manipulation of the original Saharan language. The
Bible repeats the command to distort the original language in Genesis 11:7.
Hypothesis 5: These newly
created languages were then introduced to the local populations by taking
young boys into residential schools and forcing the new order onto them,
where they were often brutally treated. The purpose was to destroy the old
religion and language and the traditional oral teaching of wisdom, religion
and legends, replacing it with a patriarchal vision of the world and
civilization. They almost succeeded. The hidden sentences in the invented
words can be decoded) with the
use of the Basque dictionary and a simple formula (see Saharan Language).
Nyland (2001) proposed that all highly
developed languages on earth (except possibly Chinese and some other Oriental
languages) might have been developed from the original Saharan language, which in itself was also scholarly
enhanced from the Neolithic substratum. There exists no
"family" of Indo-European or Semitic languages. There are no
Indo-European or proto-Indo-European languages. Scholars invented all these unstable
languages. Only Saharan has remained relatively unchanged and is now spoken as Basque.
also see Evolution of Human Languages]