Ethicists’ and Non-Ethicists’ Responsiveness to Student Emails:
Relationships among Expressed Normative Attitude, Self-Described Behavior, and Experimentally Observed Behavior
(forthcoming in Metaphilosophy)
Joshua Rust and Eric Schwitzgebel
Do professional ethicists behave any morally better than do other professors? Do they show any greater consistency between their normative attitudes and their behavior? In response to a survey question, a large majority of professors (83% of ethicists, 83% of non-ethicist philosophers, and 85% of non-philosophers) expressed the view that “not consistently responding to student emails” is morally bad. A similarly large majority of professors claimed to respond to at least 95% of student emails. We sent these professors, and others, three emails designed to look like queries from students. Ethicists’ email response rates were within chance of the other two groups’. Expressed normative view correlated with self-estimated rate of email responsiveness, especially among the ethicists. However, empirically measured email responsiveness was at best weakly correlated with self-estimated email responsiveness; and professors’ expressed normative attitude was not significantly correlated with empirically measured email responsiveness for any of the three groups.
By following either of the links below, you are requesting a copy for personal use only, in accord with "fair use" laws.
Click here to view this document as a PDF file: Ethicists' Email Responsiveness (January 3, 2013).
Or here to view the penultimate version as an HTM file: Ethicists' Email Responsiveness (January 3, 2013).
Or email eschwitz at domain: ucr.edu for a copy of this paper.
Return to Eric Schwitzgebel's homepage.