A Defense of the Rights of Artificial IntelligencesEric Schwitzgebel and Mara Garza
Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 39 (2015), 98-119
There are possible artificially intelligent beings who do not differ in any morally relevant respect from human beings. Such possible beings would deserve moral consideration similar to that of human beings. Our duties to them would not be appreciably reduced by the fact that they are non-human, nor by the fact that they owe their existence to us. Indeed, if they owe their existence to us, we would likely have additional moral obligations to them that we donít ordinarily owe to human strangers Ė obligations similar to those of parent to child or god to creature. Given our moral obligations to such AIs, two principles for ethical AI design recommend themselves: (1) design AIs that tend to provoke reactions from users that accurately reflect the AIsí real moral status, and (2) avoid designing AIs whose moral status is unclear. Since human moral intuition and moral theory evolved and developed in contexts without AI, those intuitions and theories might break down or become destabilized when confronted with the wide range of weird minds that AI design might make possible.
Official published version here.
By following either of the links below, you are requesting a copy for personal use only, in accord with "fair use" laws.
Click here to view the penultimate draft as a PDF file: A Defense of the Rights of Artificial Intelligences (pdf, September 15, 2015).
Or here to view the penultimate draft as an HTM file: A Defense of the Rights of Artificial Intelligences (htm, September 15, 2015).
Or email eschwitz at domain: ucr.edu for a copy of this paper.
Return to Eric Schwitzgebel's homepage.