File:
<ethnic1.htm> [For teaching purposes only; do not review, quote or
abstract] Index <American Archeology>
ETHNIC
DIVERSITY IN AMERICA BEFORE COLUMBUS
SUGGESTS
PREHISTORIC OLD WORLD CONTACTS
Archeologists and anthropologists have
long suspected that peoples of the Old World had made contact with the
Americas many centuries before Columbus (Hristov & Genoves 1999). The human figures sculptured in stone and
pottery, found at archeological sites spanning great distances in America,
reveal African, Asian and European as well as Amerindian influences (see: Ethnic Diversity). The oldest and largest stone sculptures
dating 1,000 or more years before the Christian Era, are some of the finest
examples depicting humans in pre-Columbian America, and the earliest craftsmanship
depicts a people with multiethnic ancestry.
Although admitting to the Some archeologists have gone the
extreme to explain away the African influence in
particular. For example, Coe &
Diehl (1980), referring to the massive stone sculptures, some weighing more
than 40 tons, stated, "Much ink has been spilled about the 'negroid' The Olmec is one of the
earliest known American civilizations that began in Southern Mexico around
2,000 B.C. The name in Aztec Nahuatl
means "People of the Land of
Rubber." Ethnically and
culturally they exhibited African and Asian influences (Example #1, #2).
These people were concerned about their identity to the extent that
they devoted considerable resources to document their presence through the
construction of gigantic monuments, the quality of which demanded A close examination of the sculptures
and other artwork after ca. 950 B.C. shows continuing, but diminishing Olmec
influence, which was accompanied by periodic massive destruction of their
monuments. Many of the largest sculptures
sustained mutilation on a massive scale, in an effort that must have almost
equaled that of their creation. It
has been implied that this may have been a ritual at the death of an old
ruler, or caused by outside invaders.
Following 200 B.C., there appears to have been a long period of
integration with the Eurasian peoples moving in from the north and
elsewhere. Around this time the
quality of the human rendition in ceramics became especially advanced, sometimes
equaling anything being produced today (e.g.,
Figs. et27, 54, 55, 63 & 66).
The legend of Quezalcoatl suggests that this "god" with
possible African ancestry (Fig. 182), left the area sometime after 500
AD. Could there have been a return of
some Olmec back to Africa back then?
Certainly, the Olmec culture diminished its influence in the humid
lowlands of southern Mexico after the 1st Century AD. Speculations on the reason for this have
included a widespread outbreak of malaria (origins in Africa) and aggressive
invaders from the north. However, the
African presence is maintained in Mesoamerica through Aztec times in the 15th
Century, implying repeated contacts, accidental or otherwise, with the
African continent. Another argument against the
Pre-Columbian colonization of America by people from the Old World implies
the independent development of "identical"
European, African and Asian ethnic types in both hemispheres, which is not
easy to imagine. Anthropologists
generally agree that true humans, Homo
sapiens, first began to appear around 80,000 B.C. in southern Africa
(Larick & Ciochon 1996). However,
a recent article released by the Associated Press places this date much
earlier (see 700,000 BP, Britain and Diamond).
They had evolved independently with a close relative, Homo erectus, which left central
Africa around l.5 million B.C., and spread to all parts of the world with the
possible exception of America (Leakey 1995).
However, the Calico site in California has already been suspected as a
possible Homo erectus site (see Early Humans). Analyses of the DNA in mitochondria and the Y chromosome have
shown that Homo sapiens left Africa in two small groups through
present day Yemen and spread to other parts of the world around 50,000
B.C.. Various races of humans
developed in the different geographic regions of the world from wherever Homo sapiens settled down. It took a long, long time for this to
occur to the degree that our major races differ today. A conservative estimate for the
differences between some Asian, African and European ethnic groups would be
at least 20,000 years. As Africa was
the point of origin of Homo sapiens,
it would make ethnic groups in Africa the most ancient, with a period of
development probably exceeding 80,000 years (Please see James Shreeve for detailed account). In America, the accepted dates for the
earliest presence of humans range from 15,000 B.P to 40,000 B.P., although
earlier dates are suspected and eventually could be found (see Savannah). Although initial
migrations of Homo sapiens to America were by way of a temporary land bridge
between Siberia and Alaska around 15,000 B.C., much later migration routes from Europe,
Africa and Asia varied. Some ideas
hold that humans sailed west, across the Atlantic, in boats, beginning
probably after 4,000 B.C. Another
speculation is that they arrived first on the Pacific coast to the State of
Guerrero, Mexico. Indeed, the
Polynesian chicken existed in South America prior to the arrival of Europeans
in the 16th Century (see Chickens), most likely transported there by
Polynesians who then brought back home sweet potatoes and the bottle guord.
Huyghe (1992) pointed out that some Africans, for example, utilized large
vessels capable of carrying many tons, in their trading activities around the
Indian Ocean. There was also
extensive sailing activity by the Phoenicians and Romans up and down the
coasts of Europe and Africa; and at least one ancient wreck has been
discovered off the coast of Brazil (Fig. 76, Marx 1992). It is imaginable that occasionally some of the vessels, with
variable ethnic groups on board, may have gotten off their course during
storms, and landed in America. Bailey
(1994) advanced the possibility of early quests for raw materials, such as
tin and copper, in America by seafaring European people during the Bronze Age
(6,000-1,190 B.C.) [also see Bronze].
The possibility that Egypt might have had intense contact with North
America is supported by the discovery in 1950 of large boats adjacent to
Khufu’s great pyramid. They were
buried between 2589 and 2566 B.C. One
has been restored and it shows considerable wear as if it had been on long
journeys. Its length is 43.63 meters,
width 5.66 meters (see Egyptian
Boat). The absence of
bronze tools among the artifacts found in America has not been explained and
this argues against contacts with the Old World during the Bronze Age (Please
see Bronze Age
Tools). There is
historical evidence for a large seafaring trade in reindeer hides by people
from the Mediterranean area (see Sea Peoples). Edo Nyland has reviewed the information available and concluded
that Pre-Columbian voyages, especially from the Mediterranean Region, were
almost a certainty (see Human
Migrations). Extraordinary
finds of ancient Asiatic and Middle Eastern writing and sculpture are being
found in the Lake Titicaca region of western South America by Bernardo Biados
and a team of archeologists (see Biados). The European and
Asian faces in sculpture and artifacts appearing intermittently after
2,000 B.C., show a trend for the former to be more numerous in colder and
drier areas, and the latter in the humid tropical lowlands. The possibility of contact by people from
southern and central Asia in Pre-Columbian America has been advanced (Carter
1964, 1976; Ekholm 1946, 1953, 1964, Estrada et al. 1962, Heine-Geldern 1954, 1959; Jairazbhoy 1976, Phillips
1966, Shao 1976, Smith 1915). In the History of the Liang Dynasty,
published in China ca. 629 AD, there is mention of a voyage around 499 AD to
a country that was very likely America (Shao 1976). The actual place was described as "The Country of the
Extreme East." Shao (1976) also
showed many photographs of statues and temple art of Mesoamerica that bear a
very close resemblance to similar early art of China and India. In particular, the depiction of elephants
on some of the early Mayan temples has always been a mystery (Figs. 128, 131 & 133).
Although mammoths had been hunted by people in Southern Mexico in
8,000 B.C. (Coe 1994), they were extinct long before development of the Maya
civilization. The art styles found in
Honduras especially resemble those of early India and southern China. Many of these associations were already
noted by Vining (1885). The finding of Japanese type pottery in coastal
Ecuador from ca. 3,000 B.C. has been attributed to early contact there
possibly by people from Japan sailing down with the coastal currents in small
boats (Jairazbhoy 1976, Meggers 1992, Meggers & Evans 1966). Coe (1994) noted a similarity between the
architecture at El Tajín, Mexico and Bronze and Iron Age cultures of China. The
apparent discovery of the American drugs cocaine and tobacco in Egyptian
mummies has been discussed at length by S. A. Wells (see Mummy).
There has been an especially interesting, but controversial, Norse
connection in North America by 1,700 B.C., as revealed in pictographs and
petroglyphs (Figs. 11, 15, & 19) (Fell 1982).
Some Norse settlements even appear to have developed to the level of herding
bighorn sheep (Fig. 20) (see Attachment
#1). An advanced form of weaving may also have
been brought to America by these visitors (Bronze Figs. 158, 159, 161). Legends are
widespread in Polynesia of contacts with white people (see Polynesia). Other unanswered questions include why are
there so many Japanese words and phrases in the Zuni language of New Mexico
and Arizona, and why do some of the native Purepecha language in the State of
Michoacán, Mexico bears little resemblance to Nahuatl, the primary indigenous
language in Mesoamerica? Furthermore,
the existence of a widespread universal language in pre-Christian times, the Saharan Language, provides clues
to Pre-Columbian voyages throughout the world. Linguistics
Archeology that studies the relationships of modern languages to the
ancient Saharan Language is giving us greater insight into people’s
migrations. Some more recent sailings
to America by Europeans after 700 A.D. have been suggested (see Great Ireland and West Virginia Petroglyph). The presence of cultivated plants also
sometimes suggests pre-Columbian contact with Asia and Africa, although caution
is advised before making definite comparisons (see <Plants>). For example, Spanish friars reported that
the Maya in Yucatan were growing both yams and sweet potatoes at the time of
the Spanish conquest (Landa 1556). However,
the genus of yams, Dioscorea,
occurs as separate species in America, Asia and Africa. The botanist,
Galletty Wilson maintained that tobacco, a native
American plant, was in use across Africa long before the arrival of
Portuguese traders; and the American sweet potato was thought to be
cultivated in Uganda before the time of Columbus (Bailey 1994). Bernal (1973) remarked that the American
peanut was probably cultivated in China by 3,000 B.C. Pompeiian murals have been reported to
contain accurate portrayals of two tropical American plants, the pineapple
and the sour sop, Annona squamosa
(Neugebauer 1962). American
cultivated cottons are tetraploid,
with one set of genes resembling the genes of American wild cottons, and the
other set that of all Asiatic cottons (Bailey 1994, Brücher 1989). Human intervention would be essential to
explain this relationship. Tetraploid
cotton was being used in Peru in 4,000 B.C.! The American sweet potato, Ipomoea batatas, is especially
interesting, because many varieties of it were being grown in Polynesia long
before European contact there (Brücher).
Its name there and in America is close to "kumar" or "camote," which comes from the
Sanskrit word "kumari" (Bailey 1994). The coconut, believed to be from Southeast Asia, is thought by
some to have been present in America when the Spaniards arrived. Coconuts cannot remain viable after
floating for a long time in seawater. The bottle gourd, Lagenaria
siceraria, is a container plant of African origin. Its earliest occurrence in America was in
the Ayacucho Basin of Peru ca. 11,000 B.C. (Lathrop 1977). It was grown throughout America as long
ago as 7,000 B.C. Although it was believed
spread by ocean currents, its seeds cannot remain viable for the length of
time that floating to America would take.
Brücher (1989) puzzled at how this plant crossed to the Pacific side
of America at such an early date. The
Arabs may have brought American maize into
Spain in the 13th Century (Bailey 1994).
Bailey (1994) suggests other interesting plant examples. Some of
the more readily available Pre-Columbian sculptures and figures found in the
Americas are shown in the following links.
These are arranged chronologically as Preclassic (1800 B.C. - 150 AD), Classic (150 AD - 900 AD), and Post-Classic (900 AD - 1521 AD). They show the multiethnic characteristics
that at various times have exerted an influence in America, and some of the
marvelous artwork associated with the various cultures. They are represented as closely as
possible to the original works, and their dates are derived primarily from the
respective cited references, which should be consulted for detail. Von
Wuthenau (1969) emphasized that the individual and ethnic characteristics of
the human face are something that no one could invent by accident. Moreover, with the most elementary logic
and to all artistic experience an Amerindian could not depict in a masterly
way the head of an African, Asian or European without missing a single
characteristic, unless he had actually seen such a person. The wide
scale destruction of historical documents in America by the Aztecs, who
strove to rewrite history in their own image, and by European invaders after
the Conquest, has contributed to our present ignorance of Pre-Columbian
history in America. Foreign diseases,
such as smallpox, measles and whooping cough, decimated the native
populations in Mexico alone by an estimated 86% by 1700 AD (Coe 1994). Certainly, such high mortality contributed
to a great reduction of ethnic diversity in America. Continuing to ignore the many authors
cited herein who have painstakingly strived to record remnants of this
history is unconscionable in view of the fact that their evidence for
Pre-Columbian contact cannot be refuted.
Recovered artifacts are scattered in museums and private collections
around the world where they are not generally accessible. To chronologically assemble some of the
evidence for Pre-Columbian contacts in America should stimulate additional
searches and a broader discussion of the subject. This in turn may lead to new perspectives on our knowledge of
ethno-historical events and human population migrations. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment
#1 (FURTHER DETAIL) As of November 2007 there have been
few implements found in the Americas that date from the Bronze Age. (Please see Discussion) Nevertheless,
Fell (1982) noted that several outstanding facts become increasingly apparent
from various epigraphic expeditions.
He stated, "One is that we have greatly underrated the
achievements of the Bronze Age peoples of northern Europe. We have long known, from their conspicuous
carvings that constitute the rock art of the Bronze Age, that the North Sea
and the Baltic were the home waters of fleets of ships. What we have failed to realize is that
those same ships and characteristic Bronze Age style, are also depicted on
the rocks and cliffs of the maritime regions of eastern North America. And now it is also apparent that these
same matching petroglyphs, on both sides of the Atlantic, are also
accompanied by readable texts cut in ancient scripts that are likewise found
on either side of the Atlantic," (Also see Colonization). The voyages
occurred just as the Iron Age was beginning, so that the explorers might have
brought with them implements of iron instead of bronze (see Picture), and most
would have probably rusted away. What this means,
of course, is that the ancient shipwrights made sound vessels, whose skippers
and crews sailed them across the ocean, thereby fulfilling their builders'
dreams. Flotillas of ancient Norse,
Baltic, and Nordic (often erroneously referred to as Celtic—see Celts) ships each
summer set their prows to the northwest, to cross the Atlantic, to return
later in the season with cargoes of raw materials furnished by the
Algonquians with whom they traded. To
make these crossings they depended in part upon the sea roads that had been
opened up by the amelioration of the climate at the peak of the Bronze Age.
[see Climate] As oceanographers have inferred, the polar
ice melted then, and the favorable westward-flowing air and water currents
generated by the permanent polar high now became available to aid in the
westward passage. The return voyage,
as always, could be made on the west wind drift, in the latitude of around 40E-north
latitude, as Columbus rediscovered.
While these Norse traders opened up the northern parts of North
America, other sailors from the Mediterranean lands were doing similar
things... but their outward voyage lay along the path that Columbus employed,
utilizing the westward-blowing trade winds, found at latitudes below 30E
N. Both sets of navigation, though
employing different outward routes, were obliged to use the same homeward
track, that of the west wind drift in middle latitudes. Along this common sea road the sailors of
the two different regions would occasionally meet, thus prompting
intercultural exchanges between the Baltic lands and North Africa, as Fell
(1982) had inferred previously. At least twice since the close of the Stone Age,
conditions have favored such events.
The first occurred during the warm period of the middle Bronze
Age. Then the world's climates cooled
again, and the northern route to America became too ice-bound and too
dangerous to attract adventurers in that direction any longer [see Climate].
It remained thus until about AD 700, when once more the earth's
climate ameliorated. Once again the
northern icecap melted and the polar seas could support navigation that made
use of the polar high. Once more
mariners came to northeastern America, this time under a name by which they
are known in history--The Vikings.
Yet, as the inscriptions show, these Vikings were not just Norsemen,
they included as before men from the Baltic lands, Lithuanians and Latvians,
as well as peoples from Ireland and probably also Wales. After AD 1,200 the earth grew colder
again, the thousand vineyards of William the Conqueror's England died out,
and Normans turned their attention to the south of Europe to bring in their
Malmsey wines, no longer fermented in England, where no vineyards now
survived. The old routs to America
were deserted, and that western land lay ignored by Europe until the voyage
of Columbus once more awakened the cupidity of monarchs who, by this time,
now controlled large populations of Europe.
This time the full force of European exploitation fell upon the
Amerindians, and the age of American isolation had ended. Another remarkable fact that now
impresses itself upon our minds is that the ancient Europeans were not
barbarians. They not only spoke in
the chief dialects of the Indo-European tongues, but already by late
Neolithic times, the Europeans could
write. The languages they wrote
now prove to have been comprehensible to us as representing the principal
tongues of modern Europe: Teutonic,
Baltic, Celtic, and Basque. Yet,
another surprising discovery is due to Professor Linus Brunner, who announced
in 1981 the occurrence of Semitic vocabulary in the newly identified Rhaetic
language of ancient Switzerland. The heretofore mysterious people,
to whom the archeologists have attached such names as 'Beaker Folk,'
'Bell-beaker People,' and so on, now prove to be Europeans of presently
existing stocks. They spoke in early
variant forms of languages that we can see as related closely to the
classical Teutonic, Norse, and other tongues of Europe at the time of the
Romans. The inscriptions found on
their artifacts prove this. That it
was not understood before is simply because archeologists have mistaken the
writing for decorative engraving.
When a loom weight has inscribed upon it the word warp, it is obvious that this is a purely practical
identification label for a weaver.
Decorative it may be, but let us not overlook the fact that such a
label tells us immediately the linguistic stock of the person who engraved
it. Moreover, of course, it certifies
that the engraver belonged to a literate society. The Pre-Christian languages that were spoken were apparently
all very closely related to a most ancient form, Saharan (see Migrations
for
a more extensive treatment of this subject).
The Basque Language apparently survives as a close approximation of
ancient Saharan. When we examine the rock and cliff inscriptions of
Scandinavia, we discover that the 'meaningless' decorations beside their ship
carvings are none other than a readable comment in Baltic speech. They are appropriate to the scene
depicted, and we know at once that the designer was familiar with the
language spoken by the ancestors of the people who still live along the
Baltic coasts today. They were, in
short, Balts. Let us recognize this
simple fact, and call them by their proper names. In addition, when we find very similar, and similarly lettered,
engravings on North American rocks, it is our obligation to recognize their
European origins, and to call them by their proper names too. ----------------------- Fell, B. 1982.
Bronze Age America. Little, Brown & Co., Boston,
Toronto. 304 p. |
