File: <ethiop-1.key> [Navigate to
MAIN MENU]
Key
to Families of
African Chalcidoidea
(Derived fr. Prinsloo, 1980 & 1984 by E. F. Legner)
Please CLICK on key desired:
Key to Families
of African Chalcidoidea
Key to Most Common
Families of African Chalcidoidea
[Please refer to <Guide> for illustrations (Powerful connections use <Guide-2>)]
Prinsloo
(1980) characterized Chalcidoidea by their small size, about 2-4 mm. length,
metallic
appearance and elbowed antennae. He regarded them distinguished from most other parasitic
Hymenoptera by the reduced fore wing
venation, comprising at most a submarginal, marginal, stigmal
(radial) and postmarginal vein (Fig. 7). They are different from Proctotrupoidea,
which resemble them,
by the pronotum which does not reach
backwards to meet the tegulae, or wing covers (Figs. 7-8). The
following keys are for both males and
females:
1a. Tarsi with 3 segments; fore wing without a
postmarginal vein, the wing disc with setae arranged in radiating
rows (Figs. A-B); body not <1.0
mm....................................................................................Trichogrammatidae
1b. Tarsi with 4-5 segments, except in some
apterous males of fig insects; setae on wing disc arranged other than
previous
(1a)..........................................................................................................................................................2
2a. Hind wing with a basal stalk composed of
submarginal vein, the wing disc ribbon-like, not extending to its
base; fore wing often with venation and
setation as in Figs. A-C; antennal sockets with venation and setation as
in Figs. A-C; antennal sockets far apart,
close to eye margins; tarsi with 4-5 segments; slender, dainty, usually
<1.0 mm long................
.....................................................................................................................Mymaridae
2b. Hind wing not petiolate, fore wing shaped
different from previous (2a); antennal sockets usually closer
together, well separated from eyes;
mostly >1.0
mm...........................................................................................3
3a. Hind leg with coxa much enlarged and
flattened, like a plate, the tibia with stout, dark setae, arranged in a
definite pattern; female antenna with 3
funicle segments, that of male always branched; fore wing shaped like a
wedge; tarsi with 4 segments (Figs.
A-C.................................................................................................Elasmidae
3b. Hind coxa not flattened, all other
characters combined are different than previous
(3a)...................................4
4a. Femur of hind leg swollen, its ventral
margin toothed; hind tibia curved (Figs.
A-H)......................................5
4b. Hind femur normal, not swollen; hind tibia
not curved.....................................................................................8
5a. Fore wing folded longitudinally when
resting; ovipositor generally long, recurved over apex and gaster dorsum;
frequently bear color patterns like wasps
(Figs. A-B).................. .....................................................Leucospidae
5b. Different from previous
(5a)..............................................................................................................................6
6a. Head and thorax coarsely sculptured, with
pits or large punctations; body robust, does not refract light, usually
black, sometimes with yellowish to orange
markings (Figs. A-E).... .................................................Chalcididae
6b. Head and thorax finely sculptured, not
coarsely punctate or pitted; body often slender, always metallic or
partially
metallic...................................................................................................................................................7
7a. Gaster somewhat compressed longitudinally,
the dorsum almost convex in profile; hind coxa 2X as long as fore
coxa; ovipositor generally protrudes
prominently at gastral apex, often by more than body length (frequently
primary parasitoids of Mantidae oothecae)
(Figs. A-C)...........................Torymidae (part: Monodontomerinae).
7b. Gaster depressed, dorsally flattened; hind
coxa not much longer and larger than fore coxa; ovipositor usually at
most slightly exserted caudally; parasitoids
of woodboring Coleoptera.......Pteromalidae (part: Chalcidectinae)
8a. Head prognathous, elongated, flattened,
sometimes with a median longitudinal furrow or excavation; body
smooth, shiny, without sculpture,
brownish or yellowish, without metallic reflections; fore and hind tibiae
stout,
the femora often longer than tibiae;
associated with fig fruits (Ficus spp.) (Figs.
A-B)......................................9
8b. Different than previous (8a); if head prognathous
and body smooth without sculpture (rare as in some
Pteromalidae: Cerocephaline and a few
Encyrtidae), then thoracic dorsum not as appears in Fig. A................11
9a. Apterous males only (Fig. A); 3 pairs of
tarsi frequently differing in number of segments; eyes and ocelli
frequently absent................
....................................................Agaonidae & Torymidae
(part = Sycophaginae)
9b. Females winged................................................................................................................................................10
10a. Mandibles with large proximal appendage
lying against underside of head, usually ridged transversely (Fig.
A)..........................................................................................................................................................Agaonidae
10b. Mandible lacking proximal
appendage..............................................Torymidae (part =
Sycophaginae, part).
11a. Thorax characteristically shaped as
follows: scutellum like a transverse
band, axillae not distinct, propodeum
with a median triangular area, usually
shiny; body frequently shorter than 1.0 mm, dorsally flattened, smooth,
usually blackish, sometimes yellow; short
antennae, with 2-4 very small funicle segments, the club long, not
segmented; fore wing often with long
marginal fringe. Femur and tibia of
middle leg with long spines, tibial
spur strongly developed, toothed (Figs.
A-D)................................................................................Signiphoridae
11b. Not as previous
(11a)....................................................................................................................................12
12a. Thorax short and arched, with pronotum
reduced and not visible in dorsal view; apex of scutellum sometimes
with processes; head small, somewhat
triangular; mandibles large, sickle-shaped; abdominal petiole frequently
long and slender; parasitoids of ants
(Figs. A-B) ......................................Eucharitidae (including Philomedes)
12b. Pronotum clearly visible from above, other
characters in combination different from previous (12a); no ant
parasitoids........................................................................................................................................................13
13a. Thorax with mesopleura large, convex, without
any vertical grooves or lines; middle tibia with sturdily
developed, straight, apical spur (Figs
A-D)......................................................................................................14
13b. Mesopleura not large and convex, often with
vertical grooves; middle tibial spur comparatively small and
weakly developed, except in males of
Eupelmidae..........................................................................................16
14a. Thorax with large, swollen prepectus,
projected forward to cover lateral part of pronotum (Fig. A)
...............................................................................................................................................Tanaostigmatidae
14b. Prepectus small, not swollen, does not cover
pronotum
laterally.................................................................15
15a. Middle coxae inserted close to fore coxae,
at about middle of mesopleuron; thorax with disc of mesoscutum
convex or flat, not impressed with
grooves or ridges; marginal vein of fore wing comparatively short, sometimes
rudimentary; antenna rarely with more
than 6 funicle segments (Figs. A-U)......................................Encyrtidae
15b. Middle coxa inserted close to hind coxa, at
about posterior end of mesopleuron; disc of mesoscutum almost
impressed at least posteriorly; antenna
with 7 funicle segments (5 in Neanastatus); marginal vein long, usually
much longer than stigmal or postmarginal
veins (Figs. A-D)................................................Eupelmidae (part).
16a. Hind tarsus with 4
segments..........................................................................................................................17
16b. Hind tarsus with 5
segments..........................................................................................................................19
17a. Males only:
antenna with 11-12 segments; pronotum large, bell-shaped, usually indistinctly
separated from
mesoscutum, the hind margin usually
indistinct; scutellum without setae, except for 2 pairs of long bristles (Figs.
A-B)....................................................................................................................................Tetracampidae (part)
17b. Males not as previous (17a), or
females........................................................................................................18
18a. Abdominal gaster broadly sessile, its base broadly
associated with propodeum; body not refract light, <1.0
mm. long (Figs.
A-J)..............................................................................................................Aphelinidae (part).
18b. Gaster definitely constricted at its
junction with propodeum, the petiole usually visible; body usually at least
partly refracting light, usually >1.0
mm. long (Fig.
A-C)..................................................................Eulophidae
19a. Gaster broadly sessile; body <1.5 mm.
long, does not refract light; antennae with not more than 8 distinct
segments; fore wing with stigmal vein at
most short, the postmarginal vein indistinct (Figs. A-C)
..............................................................................................................................................Aphelinidae (part)
19b. Gaster definitely constricted at junction
with propodeum, the petiole frequently visible; antenna with 8 or
more segments; often larger
species...............................................................................................................20
20a. Pronotum viewed dorsally, large,
subretangular; body usually black, never with metallic lustre; thorax and
head coarsely sculptured; parapsidal
sulci complete (Figs. A-D).... ..............................................Eurytomidae
20b. Pronotum viewed from above, not
subretangular, or if rarely so, then body distinctly refracts light and thorax
then finely
sculptured.....................................................................................................................................21
21a. Dorsum of gaster occupied largely by the
somewhat fused basal two tergites (separated only by a thin line)
which are laterally separated, giving the
gaster a triangular shape in lateral view; thorax with prepectus fused
with lateral part of pronotum; body
robust, usually metallic, the thorax frequently coarsely pitted but also finely
striate; antennae short with one ring
segment and 7 transverse segments (Figs. 34, 35)...............Perilampidae
21b. Segmentation and shape of gaster not as
previous (21a); prepectus not fused with pronotum laterally; other
characters in combination
different................................................................................................................22
22a. Mesoscutum with parapsidal sulci incomplete,
not reaching posterior margin of mesoscutum.
.........................................................................................................................................Pteromalidae (part)
22b. Parapsidal sulci complete, reaching hind
margin of mesoscutum..............................................................23
23a. Fore wing with stigmal vein typically
enlarged button-like; body yellow to brownish, the thorax sometimes
partly metallic green; ovipositor
protrudes strongly backward (Fig. A).. ......Torymidae (part: Megastigminae)
23b. Fore wing venation different from previous
(23a)..........................................................................................24
24a. Hind coxa plainly larger and longer than
fore coxa, usually more than 3X as long as the latter; fore wing with
stigmal vein short (Figs.
A-C).............................................................................................................................25
24b. Hind coxa hardly larger than fore coxa, the
stigmal vein relatively long (Figs. A-B) ..............................
..................................................................................................................................................................................26
25a. Gaster finely sculptured, shiny; ovipositor
protruding strongly backward, often by more than length of body;
body somewhat slender (Fig.
A)................................................................................................Torymidae (part)
25b. Gaster coarsely sculptured, often pitted, in
female subconical with a long epipygium (distal tergite); ovipositor
protrudes at most slightly backward; body
robust (Figs. A-B)....... .....................................................Ormyridae
26a. Males only: middle tibia with strongly
developed, straight, apical spur (as in Figs. A-B); antenna with one
ring-segment and 7 funicle segments (5 in
Neanastatus).................... .....................................Eupelmidae (part)
26b. Males and females: middle tibial spur weak; antenna often with more than one ring
segment......................27
27a. Scutellum without setae except for 2 long pairs
of bristles; pronotum large, bell-shaped, the hind margin
usually closely joined to mesoscutum;
fore tibia with apical spur weakly developed, usually straight (Figs. A-
B)........................................................................................................................................Tetracampidae (part)
27b. Scutellum with setation different from
previous (27a); pronotum usually relatively small, not bell-shaped; fore
tibial spur stronger, curved (Figs. A-E)..................................................................................Pteromalidae (part)
Key to Most Common Families of African Chalcidoidea
(derived
fr. Prinsloo, 1980 by E. F. Legner)
1a. Tarsi with 3 segments (Fig. A).............................................................................................Trichogrammatidae
1b. Tarsi with 4-5
segments.....................................................................................................................................2
2a. Hind wing basally petiolate; less than 1.0
mm. long (Figs. A-C)......................................................Mymaridae
2b. Hind wing not
petiolate......................................................................................................................................3
3a. Hind coxa greatly enlarged, flattened,
plate-like; tarsi with 4 segments (Figs. A-C)...... ..................Elasmidae
3b. Hind coxa never
flattened.....................................................................................................................................4
4a. Fore wing folded longitudinally, the
ovipositor recurved over apex and dorsum of gaster (Figs. A-B)
.............................................................................................................................................................Leucospidae
4b. Fore wing not folded longitudinally, the
ovipositor not recurved over gastral dorsum
......................................
...............................................................................................................................................5
5a. Hind femur swollen, its ventral margin
toothed (Figs. A-I)..................................................................................6
5b. Hind femur not swollen, very rarely
toothed........................................................................................................7
6a. Body without a metallic lustre (Figs.
A-E)........................................................................................Chalcididae
6b. Body with a metallic green, blue or purplish
lustre (Figs. A-C)................................................Torymidae (part)
7a. Mandible with a large appendage which lies
against underside of head (Fig. A).................Agaonidae (females)
7b. Mandible without previously noted appendage
(7a)............................................................................................8
8a. Thorax typically shaped: scutellum in the shape of a transverse band,
the axillae indistinct (Figs. A-D)
..........................................................................................................................................................Signiphoridae
8b. Thorax shaped different from that described
previously
(8a)..............................................................................9
9a. Pronotum not visible in dorsal view (Figs.
A-C).............................................................................Eucharitidae
9b. Pronotum clearly visible from
above..................................................................................................................10
10a. Thorax with mesopleura large, convex,
without any vertical grooves or lines (Figs. A-D)..............................11
10b. Mesopleura impressed, often
grooved...............................................................................................................12
11a. Middle coxa inserted closer to fore coxa
than to hind coxa (Figs. A-U).............................................Encyrtidae
11b. Middle coxa inserted closer to hind coxa
(Figs. A-D)......................................................Eupelmidae (females)
12a. Tarsi with 4 segments, the gaster distinctly
constricted at its junction with propodeum (Fig. A-C).Eulophidae
12b. Tarsi with 5 segments, if rarely some tarsi have
4 segments, then gaster broadly sessile ................................13
13a. Gaster broadly sessile (Figs.
A-I)......................................................................................................Aphelinidae
13b. Gaster distinctly constricted at its
junction with propodeum, the petiole sometimes
distinct...........................14
14a. Pronotum large, subrectangular; body does
not refract light (Figs. A-D).......................................Eurytomidae
14b. Pronotum different than previous (14a), if
rarely rectangular, then body at least partially refracts light.........15
15a. Fore wing with stigmal vein enlarged
button-like (Fig. A).......................... Torymidae (part:
Magastigminae)
15b. Venation of forewing not as previous
(15a)......................................................................................................16
16a. Dorsum of gaster occupied largely by partly
fused basal tergites (separated only by a thin line) which are
laterally separated, the gaster
triangular in lateral view (Figs. A-B)........
.........................................Perilampidae
16b. Shape of gaster and segmentation not as
previous............................................................................................17
17a. Mesoscutum with parapsidal sulci incomplete,
not reaching the posterior margin of mesoscutum (Fig. A)
.................................................................................................................................................Pteromalidae (part)
17b. Parapsidal sulci
complete..................................................................................................................................18
18a. Males only:
middle tibial spur strongly developed, large,
straight.................................................Eupelmidae
18b. Males & females: middle tibial spur weakly developed, small........................................................................19
19a. Hind coxa large, more than 3X as long as
fore coxa; stigmal vein very short (Figs. A-C)...............................20
19b. Hind coxa not much larger than fore coxa;
stigmal vein relatively long (Figs. A-D)........ ..Pteromalidae (part)
20a. Gaster finely sculptured, smooth; ovipositor
protrudes strongly (Figs. A-B)......................... .Torymidae (part)
20b. Gaster coarsely sculptured, usually pitted;
ovipositor at most slightly protruding, but distal tergite often
extended (Figs.
A-B)...............................................................................................................................Ormyridae
REFERENCES:
Prinsloo,
G. L. 1980. An illustrated guide to the families of African Chalcidoidea
(Insecta: Hymenoptera). Rep.
So. AFr. Dept. Agr. & Fisheries Sci.
Bull. 395. 66 p.
Prinsloo,
G. L. 1984. An illustrated guide to the parasitic wasps associated with citrus
pests in the Republic of
South Africa. Rep. So. Afr. Dept. Agr. Sci. Bull. 402. 119 p.